Active vs. Passive Management
By Brad Ball on Apr 21, 2020
The battle has raged for years…a quick internet search will yield mounds of data arguing when active will or will not outperform. It seems the opinions so often reflect the vantage point of the author. The old expression by Mark Twain seems to hold true “Figures don’t Lie, But Liars Figure”. Here we are again, right in the middle of a major selloff when “Active Management” is supposed to outperform so…how have active managers performed?
US funds led by active money managers have trailed the main indexes by 1.3 percentage points in March, according to Bernstein Research. What, you might ask? I thought active management is supposed to perform well when the market is more defensive or discriminating. As it turns out, the explanation from experts seems to be that defensive is good but not in a panic selloff which tends to still have high correlations. So, once again passive seems to be getting the best of active. This does not bode well for traditional active management where the “alpha” is driven from security selection. If security selection is fleeting or only successful over short windows of time, how can investors make intermediate or longer-term asset allocation decisions which include these strategies.
Perhaps a different kind of active management is warranted, one that focuses on a more consistent phenomenon, the harvesting of “volatility risk premium” in options. This source of alpha is more consistent than any other commonly used factor. Using a combination of this “Alpha” source with a passive underlying equity or bond portfolio can deliver superior returns than either passive or active on a standalone basis. This dual source approach is the foundation of Liquid Strategies investment discipline. To learn more about this differentiated approach to active management go to LSfunds.com
Learn more about Liquid Strategies and our offerings.
The assertions and statements in this blog post are based on the opinions of the author and Liquid Strategies. The examples cited in this paper are based on hypothetical situations and should only be considered as examples of potential trading strategies. They do not take into consideration the impact that certain economic or market factors have on the decision making process. Past performance is no indication of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss.
- May 2025 (1)
- April 2025 (8)
- March 2025 (2)
- February 2025 (1)
- January 2025 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- July 2024 (2)
- April 2024 (1)
- January 2024 (1)
- November 2023 (1)
- October 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (1)
- April 2023 (1)
- January 2023 (1)
- October 2022 (2)
- July 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (1)
- March 2022 (2)
- February 2022 (3)
- January 2022 (3)
- November 2021 (1)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (1)
- May 2021 (1)
- April 2021 (1)
- March 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (3)
- December 2020 (1)
- October 2020 (2)
- September 2020 (2)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (3)
- June 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (4)
- March 2020 (4)
- February 2020 (5)
- January 2020 (3)
- December 2019 (1)
- November 2019 (1)
- October 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (1)
Subscribe
You May Also Like
These Related Posts

White Paper - The Guide to Choosing a Hedged Equity Strategy

The Hidden Risks of Laddered Buffered ETFs and Structured Notes
